beijing 2022

Wunderkinder are too valuable for the Olympic system to set age limits

Kamila Valieva' doping case raised questions about a minimum age for Olympic athletes. The Games thrive on high-performing children – some of them so young that they are not even allowed to compete in the Youth Olympic Games. Children are vulnerable to authoritarian states chasing medals and glory.

Jens Weinreich

Feb 25, 2022 — 13 min read

Kamila Valieva. (Photo: NOC of Russia)

Why it is so hard for Olympic sports federations to set age limits? The age rules are defined very differently in the seven Olympic winter sports federations. It is no different among the summer sports federations. Age regulations sometimes differ even within these federations, depending on the sport, discipline, or gender. In the International Skating Union (ISU), a proposal to raise the minimum age in figure skating from fifteen to seventeen years failed most recently in June 2018. Of course, at the ISU congress at the time, the Russians also voted against this proposal.

The International Olympic Committee (IOC) introduced the Youth Olympic Games (YOG) at its 2007 Session in Guatemala. Why are there these global competitions called YOG, when at the same time children participate in – how shall we say: real – Olympic Games? Why is there so little coordination? Why has not even the IOC, as the sole owner of these circus events, reminded us of these Youth Games in the bitter discussions of the past weeks?

Some answers to these questions are: Because there are no clear, plausible age rules. The rules have been interpreted and changed for ages to suit the needs of the moment. And so, when – as in the case of Valieva – the whole world watches children obviously being abused as human material by medal scoundrels, then crocodile tears flow. Then the IOC president Thomas Bach, whose marketing department also turns children’s high-performance sport into money, talks about the values and lack of empathy of Kamila Valieva’s coach Eteri Tutberidze and the entire entourage.

Some thoughts on competitive sport in totalitarian systems

Before I go into the question of age limits in more detail, I would first like to express some thoughts on competitive sport in totalitarian systems. Because one is definitely related to the other.

Olympic status quo (3): IOC directors earn more money than athletes, Olympic champions – and more than any IF

The salaries of the IOC directors remain exorbitantly high. Frontrunner Christophe Dubi gets more than Christophe De Kepper. More than $50m are paid in the four-year cycle – most likely several millions more. Read the full list for 2023. And: Jacqueline Barrett passes the baton to Mattias Kaestner.

Is Hockey president Tayyab Ikram collecting hundreds of thousands of dollars in illegal commissions from the Olympic Solidarity fund?

The corruption allegations against the president of the Fédération Internationale de Hockey (FIH) are serious and bizarre. The case affects not only the FIH, but also OCA, as well as the IOC's core business: Olympic Solidarity. And here, as with several other IFs, the IOC is not taking action.

Naming and shaming (1): BDO Schweiz und die schändliche Hilfe für die FIFA

Heute beginnt eine sehr lange Serie: In loser Folge werden Firmen und Personen vorgestellt, die sich als Handlanger, Propagandisten und sonstige Helfer von korrupten Sportfunktionären, mafia-ähnlichen Sportorganisationen und Sport-Schurkenstaaten betätigen – für fürstliche Honorare. Teil 1: BDO.

Über das Gejammer von "Autonomie" und "Wertschätzung": beides muss sich der Sport (erst wieder und immer wieder neu) verdienen.

Mit wem und womit will der DOSB eigentlich in den angeblichen Continuous Dialogue mit dem IOC treten? Spricht Michael Micky Mronz, IOC-Lobbyist und Geschäftemacher, mit sich selbst und erzählt dann der deutschen Politik und dem DOSB davon, in aller Autonomie und Wertschätzung? Das sind Kernfragen.